Understanding Comparative Negligence in New York Personal Injury Cases
Understanding Comparative Negligence in New York Personal Injury Cases
When you’ve been injured in an accident, one of the first questions that may come to mind is: Who is at fault? In many cases, the answer isn’t entirely straightforward. Accidents often involve shared responsibility, which is where the legal concept of comparative negligence comes into play.
At Cheriff & Fink, P.C., we represent injured individuals across New York, and we believe it’s important for our clients to understand how comparative negligence can impact their case and potential recovery.
What Is Comparative Negligence?
Comparative negligence is a legal principle used to determine how damages are awarded when more than one party is at fault for an accident. Instead of denying recovery altogether if you share some blame, New York follows a “pure comparative negligence” rule.
This means that even if you were partially responsible for the accident, you can still recover compensation—your award will simply be reduced by your percentage of fault.
How It Works in Practice
Let’s say you were involved in a car accident and suffered $100,000 in damages. After reviewing the evidence, a court determines that:
- The other driver was 80% at fault
- You were 20% at fault
Under New York’s comparative negligence rule, you would still be able to recover damages. However, your compensation would be reduced by your share of fault:
- 20% of $100,000 = $20,000
- Your recovery = $80,000
Even if you were found to be more than 50% at fault, you would still be entitled to recover the portion of damages attributed to the other party.
Why Comparative Negligence Matters
Insurance companies often try to use comparative negligence to their advantage. By arguing that you were partially—or even mostly—responsible for your accident, they can attempt to reduce the amount they have to pay.
This makes it critically important to have experienced legal representation. Proper investigation, evidence gathering, and advocacy can significantly impact how fault is assigned in your case.
Common Situations Where Comparative Negligence Applies
Comparative negligence can arise in many types of personal injury cases, including:
- Car accidents (e.g., both drivers share blame)
- Slip and fall incidents (e.g., hazardous condition + inattention)
- Pedestrian accidents
- Construction site injuries
Each case is unique, and fault is determined based on the specific facts and evidence involved.
How Cheriff & Fink, P.C. Can Help
At Cheriff & Fink, P.C., we are dedicated to protecting the rights of injured individuals. Our team works diligently to:
- Investigate the circumstances of your accident
- Gather and preserve critical evidence
- Challenge unfair fault allegations
- Maximize your financial recovery
We understand how insurance companies operate, and we fight to ensure that our clients are not unfairly blamed for accidents they did not cause.
Final Thoughts
Comparative negligence does not prevent you from seeking justice—it simply affects how compensation is calculated. Even if you believe you may have been partially at fault, it is still worth pursuing a personal injury claim.
If you or a loved one has been injured, the attorneys at Cheriff & Fink, P.C. are here to help you understand your rights and guide you through every step of the legal process.
Contact us today for a consultation and let us advocate for the compensation you deserve.
We’re Here to Help You
Contact us today for a consultation and guidance.